tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20636240.post994816327526521715..comments2009-10-07T17:51:57.176-04:00Comments on Work/Life/Law 3.0: Judith Klein v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityProfessor Prenkerthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16376139737429352787noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20636240.post-17315825322850969102008-04-14T14:00:00.000-04:002008-04-14T14:00:00.000-04:00Great job finding this case! It's very interesting...Great job finding this case! It's very interesting to see these cases arise so close to "home." However, I am wondering why she would leave the 90-day period without filing a claim, first off, but would it matter at all that she had a previous attempt during her second claim? As a second attempt at an EEOC claim, would it merit more credibility that one had a previous issue( although invalid), or would it just aggravate one's situation? Although everything must first go through the prima facie standard, it might be interesting to view the situation on a more hollistic level. Cool case, brad!Vic Simianuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12299175451232031137noreply@blogger.com